Author: Mark

  • Discover Practical AI Tactics for GRC — Join the Free Expert Webinar

    Discover Practical AI Tactics for GRC — Join the Free Expert Webinar

    Oct 29, 2025The Hacker NewsArtificial Intelligence / Compliance

    Practical AI Tactics for GRC

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC). It’s no longer a future concept—it’s here, and it’s already reshaping how teams operate.

    AI’s capabilities are profound: it’s speeding up audits, flagging critical risks faster, and drastically cutting down on time-consuming manual work. This leads to greater efficiency, higher accuracy, and a more proactive GRC function.

    However, this powerful shift introduces significant new challenges. AI brings its own set of risks, including potential bias, dangerous blind spots, and regulatory gaps that are only beginning to be addressed by governing bodies. Staying ahead of this curve—not just struggling to keep up—requires clear, practical knowledge.

    Don’t Just Stay Afloat—Master the Change

    To help you navigate this complex landscape, we invite you to our free, high-impact webinar, “The Future of AI in GRC: Opportunities, Risks, and Practical Insights.This session is designed to deliver clarity and direction for everyone, from those just starting out to teams actively scaling AI in their processes. It’s packed with practical advice—no fluff, no hype.

    What You Will Learn

    We will dive into the most critical aspects of AI in GRC, providing actionable takeaways you can implement immediately:

    • Real-world examples of AI successfully improving compliance workflows.
    • Early lessons and best practices from teams leveraging advanced agentic AI.
    • The most common risks teams overlook—and concrete strategies to spot and mitigate them.
    • A clear view of what’s next in AI for GRC and how to strategically prepare your team.

    The speed of AI innovation is immense, and new regulations are struggling to catch up. The growing gap between technological capability and legal framework represents your immediate risk exposure.

    This webinar cuts through the complexity by bringing together experts, actionable examples, and real talk. You don’t have to wait until you’re forced to react to a risk; be the leader who is prepared for it.

    Ready to confidently move forward and make AI a real competitive advantage in your compliance strategy? Register here—it’s free and filling fast, last call to join live.

    Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Google News, Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • 10 npm Packages Caught Stealing Developer Credentials on Windows, macOS, and Linux

    10 npm Packages Caught Stealing Developer Credentials on Windows, macOS, and Linux

    Oct 29, 2025Ravie LakshmananMalware / Threat Intelligence

    Cybersecurity researchers have discovered a set of 10 malicious npm packages that are designed to deliver an information stealer targeting Windows, Linux, and macOS systems.

    “The malware uses four layers of obfuscation to hide its payload, displays a fake CAPTCHA to appear legitimate, fingerprints victims by IP address, and downloads a 24MB PyInstaller-packaged information stealer that harvests credentials from system keyrings, browsers, and authentication services across Windows, Linux, and macOS,” Socket security researcher Kush Pandya said.

    The npm packages were uploaded to the registry on July 4, 2025, and accumulated over 9,900 downloads collectively –

    • deezcord.js
    • dezcord.js
    • dizcordjs
    • etherdjs
    • ethesjs
    • ethetsjs
    • nodemonjs
    • react-router-dom.js
    • typescriptjs
    • zustand.js
    DFIR Retainer Services

    The multi-stage credential theft operation manifested in the form of various typosquatted packages impersonating popular npm libraries such as TypeScript, discord.js, ethers.js, nodemon, react-router-dom, and zustand.

    Once installed, the malware serves a fake CAPTCHA prompt and displays authentic-looking output that mimics legitimate package installations to give the impression that the setup process is proceeding along expected lines. However, in the background, the package captures the victim’s IP address, sends it to an external server (“195.133.79[.]43”), and then proceeds to drop the main malware.

    In each package, the malicious functionality is automatically triggered upon installation by means of a postinstall hook, launching a script named “install.js” that detects the victim’s operating system and launches an obfuscated payload (“app.js”) in a new Command Prompt (Windows), GNOME Terminal or x-terminal-emulator (Linux), or Terminal (macOS) window.

    “By spawning a new terminal window, the malware runs independently of the npm install process,” Pandya noted. “Developers who glance at their terminal during installation see a new window briefly appear, which the malware immediately clears to avoid suspicion.”

    The JavaScript contained within “app.js” is hidden through four layers of obfuscation — such as XOR cipher with a dynamically generated key, URL-encoding of the payload string, and using hexadecimal and octal arithmetic to obscure program flow — that are designed to resist analysis.

    The end goal of the attack is to fetch and execute a comprehensive information stealer (“data_extracter”) from the same server that’s equipped to thoroughly scan the developer’s machine for secrets, authentication tokens, credentials, and session cookies from web browsers, configuration files, and SSH keys.

    CIS Build Kits

    The stealer binary also incorporates platform-specific implementations to extract credentials from the system keyring using the keyring npm library. The harvested information is compressed into a ZIP archive and exfiltrated to the server.

    “System keyrings store credentials for critical services including email clients (Outlook, Thunderbird), cloud storage sync tools (Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive), VPN connections (Cisco AnyConnect, OpenVPN), password managers, SSH passphrases, database connection strings, and other applications that integrate with the OS credential store,” Socket said.

    “By targeting the keyring directly, the malware bypasses application-level security and harvests stored credentials in their decrypted form. These credentials provide immediate access to corporate email, file storage, internal networks, and production databases.”


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • Active Exploits Hit Dassault and XWiki — CISA Confirms Critical Flaws Under Attack

    Active Exploits Hit Dassault and XWiki — CISA Confirms Critical Flaws Under Attack

    Oct 29, 2025Ravie LakshmananVulnerability / Malware

    Threat actors are actively exploiting multiple security flaws impacting Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso and XWiki, according to alerts issued by the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and VulnCheck.

    The vulnerabilities are listed below –

    • CVE-2025-6204 (CVSS score: 8.0) – A code injection vulnerability in Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
    • CVE-2025-6205 (CVSS score: 9.1) – A missing authorization vulnerability in Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso that could allow an attacker to gain privileged access to the application.
    • CVE-2025-24893 (CVSS score: 9.8) – An improper neutralization of input in a dynamic evaluation call (aka eval injection) in XWiki that could allow any guest user to perform arbitrary remote code execution through a request to the “/bin/get/Main/SolrSearch” endpoint.

    Both CVE-2025-6204 and CVE-2025-6205 affect DELMIA Apriso versions from Release 2020 through Release 2025. They were addressed by Dassault Systèmes in early August.

    CIS Build Kits

    Interestingly, the addition of the two shortcomings to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog comes a little over a month after CISA flagged the exploitation of another critical flaw in the same product (CVE-2025-5086, CVSS score: 9.0), a week after the SANS Internet Storm Center detected in-the-wild attempts. It’s currently not known if these efforts are related.

    VulnCheck, which detected exploitation attempts targeting CVE-2025-24893, said the vulnerability is being abused as part of a two-stage attack chain that delivers a cryptocurrency miner. According to CrowdSec and Cyble, the vulnerability is said to have been weaponized in real-world attacks as far back as March 2025.

    “We observed multiple exploit attempts against our XWiki canaries coming from an attacker geolocated in Vietnam,” VulnCheck’s Jacob Baines said. “The exploitation proceeds in a two-pass workflow separated by at least 20 minutes: the first pass stages a downloader (writes a file to disk), and the second pass later executes it.”

    The payload uses wget to retrieve a downloader (“x640”) from “193.32.208[.]24:8080” and write it to the “/tmp/11909” location. The downloader, in turn, runs shell commands to fetch two additional payloads from the same server –

    • x521, which fetches the cryptocurrency miner located at “193.32.208[.]24:8080/rDuiQRKhs5/tcrond”
    • x522, which kills competing miners such as XMRig and Kinsing, and launches the miner with a c3pool.org configuration

    The attack traffic, per VulnCheck, originates from an IP address that geolocates to Vietnam (“123.25.249[.]88“) and has been flagged as malicious in AbuseIPDB for engaging in brute-force attempts as recently as October 26, 2025.

    In light of active exploitation, users are advised to apply the necessary updates as soon as possible to safeguard against threats. Several Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies are required to remediate the DELMIA Apriso flaws by November 18, 2025.


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • New TEE.Fail Side-Channel Attack Extracts Secrets from Intel and AMD DDR5 Secure Enclaves

    New TEE.Fail Side-Channel Attack Extracts Secrets from Intel and AMD DDR5 Secure Enclaves

    Oct 28, 2025Ravie LakshmananEncryption / Hardware Security

    A group of academic researchers from Georgia Tech, Purdue University, and Synkhronix have developed a side-channel attack called TEE.Fail that allows for the extraction of secrets from the trusted execution environment (TEE) in a computer’s main processor, including Intel’s Software Guard eXtensions (SGX) and Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) and AMD’s Secure Encrypted Virtualization with Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) and Ciphertext Hiding.

    The attack, at its core, involves the use of an interposition device built using off-the-shelf electronic equipment that costs under $1,000 and makes it possible to physically inspect all memory traffic inside a DDR5 server.

    “This allows us for the first time to extract cryptographic keys from Intel TDX and AMD SEV-SNP with Ciphertext Hiding, including in some cases secret attestation keys from fully updated machines in trusted status,” the researchers noted on an informational site.

    DFIR Retainer Services

    “Beyond breaking CPU-based TEEs, we also show how extracted attestation keys can be used to compromise Nvidia’s GPU Confidential Computing, allowing attackers to run AI workloads without any TEE protections.”

    The findings come weeks after the release of two other attacks aimed at TEEs, such as Battering RAM and WireTap. Unlike these techniques that target systems using DDR4 memory, TEE.Fail is the first attack to be demonstrated against DDR5, meaning they can be used to undermine the latest hardware security protections from Intel and AMD.

    The latest study has found that the AES-XTS encryption mode used by Intel and AMD is deterministic and, therefore, not sufficient to prevent physical memory interposition attacks. In a hypothetical attack scenario, a bad actor could leverage the custom equipment to record the memory traffic flowing between the computer and DRAM, and observe the memory contents during read and write operations, thereby opening the door to a side-channel attack.

    This could be ultimately exploited to extract data from confidential virtual machines (CVMs), including ECDSA attestation keys from Intel’s Provisioning Certification Enclave (PCE), necessary in order to break SGX and TDX attestation.

    “As attestation is the mechanism used to prove that data and code are actually executed in a CVM, this means that we can pretend that your data and code is running inside a CVM when in reality it is not,” the researchers said. “We can read your data and even provide you with incorrect output, while still faking a successfully completed attestation process.”

    The study also pointed out that SEV-SNP with Ciphertext Hiding neither addresses issues with deterministic encryption nor prevents physical bus interposition. As a result, the attack facilitates the extraction of private signing keys from OpenSSL’s ECDSA implementation.

    CIS Build Kits

    “Importantly, OpenSSL’s cryptographic code is fully constant-time and our machine had Ciphertext Hiding enabled, thus showing these features are not sufficient to mitigate bus interposition attacks,” they added.

    While there is no evidence that the attack has been put to use in the wild, the researchers recommend using software countermeasures to mitigate the risks arising as a result of deterministic encryption. However, they are likely to be expensive.

    In response to the disclosure, AMD said it has no plans to provide mitigations since physical vector attacks are out of scope for AMD SEV-SNP. Intel, in a similar alert, noted that TEE.fail does not change the company’s previous out-of-scope statement for these types of physical attacks.


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • New Android Trojan 'Herodotus' Outsmarts Anti-Fraud Systems by Typing Like a Human

    New Android Trojan 'Herodotus' Outsmarts Anti-Fraud Systems by Typing Like a Human

    Oct 28, 2025Ravie LakshmananMalware / Mobile Security

    Android Trojan

    Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed details of a new Android banking trojan called Herodotus that has been observed in active campaigns targeting Italy and Brazil to conduct device takeover (DTO) attacks.

    “Herodotus is designed to perform device takeover while making first attempts to mimic human behaviour and bypass behaviour biometrics detection,” ThreatFabric said in a report shared with The Hacker News.

    The Dutch security company said the Trojan was first advertised in underground forums on September 7, 2025, as part of the malware-as-a-service (MaaS) model, touting its ability to run on devices running Android version 9 to 16.

    DFIR Retainer Services

    It’s assessed that while the malware is not a direct evolution of another banking malware known as Brokewell, it certainly appears to have taken certain parts of it to put together the new strain. This includes similarities in the obfuscation technique used, as well as direct mentions of Brokewell in Herodotus (e.g., “BRKWL_JAVA”).

    Herodotus is also the latest in a long list of Android malware to abuse accessibility services to realize its goals. Distributed via dropper apps masquerading as Google Chrome (package name “com.cd3.app”) through SMS phishing or other social engineering ploys, the malicious program leverages the accessibility feature to interact with the screen, serve opaque overlay screens to hide malicious activity, and conduct credential theft by displaying bogus login screens atop financial apps.

    Additionally, it can also steal two-factor authentication (2FA) codes sent via SMS, intercept everything that’s displayed on the screen, grant itself extra permissions as required, grab the lockscreen PIN or pattern, and install remote APK files.

    But where the new malware stands out is in its ability to humanize fraud and evade timing-based detections. Specifically, this includes an option to introduce random delays when initiating remote actions such as typing text on the device. This, ThreatFabric said, is an attempt by the threat actors to make it seem like the input is being entered by an actual user.

    CIS Build Kits

    “The delay specified is in the range of 300 – 3000 milliseconds (0,3 – 3 seconds),” it explained. “Such a randomization of delay between text input events does align with how a user would input text. By consciously delaying the input by random intervals, actors are likely trying to avoid being detected by behaviour-only anti-fraud solutions spotting machine-like speed of text input.”

    ThreatFabric said it also obtained overlay pages used by Herodotus targeting financial organisations in the U.S., Turkey, the U.K., and Poland, along with cryptocurrency wallets and exchanges, indicating that the operators are attempting to actively expand their horizons.

    “It is under active development, borrows techniques long associated with the Brokewell banking Trojan, and appears purpose-built to persist inside live sessions rather than simply steal static credentials and focus on account takeover,” the company noted.


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • Researchers Expose GhostCall and GhostHire: BlueNoroff's New Malware Chains

    Researchers Expose GhostCall and GhostHire: BlueNoroff's New Malware Chains

    GhostCall and GhostHire

    Threat actors tied to North Korea have been observed targeting the Web3 and blockchain sectors as part of twin campaigns tracked as GhostCall and GhostHire.

    According to Kaspersky, the campaigns are part of a broader operation called SnatchCrypto that has been underway since at least 2017. The activity is attributed to a Lazarus Group sub-cluster called BlueNoroff, which is also known as APT38, CageyChameleon, CryptoCore, Genie Spider, Nickel Gladstone, Sapphire Sleet (formerly Copernicium), and Stardust Chollima.

    Victims of the GhostCall campaign span several infected macOS hosts located in Japan, Italy, France, Singapore, Turkey, Spain, Sweden, India, and Hong Kong, whereas Japan and Australia have been identified as the major hunting grounds for the GhostHire campaign.

    “GhostCall heavily targets the macOS devices of executives at tech companies and in the venture capital sector by directly approaching targets via platforms like Telegram, and inviting potential victims to investment-related meetings linked to Zoom-like phishing websites,” Kaspersky said.

    “The victim would join a fake call with genuine recordings of this threat’s other actual victims rather than deepfakes. The call proceeds smoothly to then encourages the user to update the Zoom client with a script. Eventually, the script downloads ZIP files that result in infection chains deployed on an infected host.”

    On the other hand, GhostHire involves approaching prospective targets, such as Web3 developers, on Telegram and luring them into downloading and executing a booby-trapped GitHub repository under the pretext of completing a skill assessment within 30 minutes of sharing the link, so as to ensure a higher success rate of infection.

    Once installed, the project is designed to download a malicious payload onto the developer’s system based on the operating system used. The Russian cybersecurity company said it has been keeping tabs on the two campaigns since April 2025, although it’s assessed that GhostCall has been active since mid-2023, likely following the RustBucket campaign.

    DFIR Retainer Services

    RustBucket marked the adversarial collective’s major pivot to targeting macOS systems, following which other campaigns have leveraged malware families like KANDYKORN, ObjCShellz, and TodoSwift.

    It’s worth noting that various aspects of the activity have been documented extensively over the past year by multiple security vendors, including Microsoft, Huntress, Field Effect, Huntabil.IT, Validin, and SentinelOne.

    The GhostCall Campaign

    Targets who land on the fake Zoom pages as part of the GhostCall campaign are initially served a bogus page that gives the illusion of a live call, only to display an error message three to five seconds later, urging them to download a Zoom software development kit (SDK) to address a purported issue with continuing the call.

    Should the victims fall for the trap and attempt to update the SDK by clicking on the “Update Now” option, it leads to the download of a malicious AppleScript file onto their system. In the event the victim is using a Windows machine, the attack leverages the ClickFix technique to copy and run a PowerShell command.

    At each stage, every interaction with the fake site is recorded and beaconed to the attackers to track the victim’s actions. As recently as last month, the threat actor has been observed transitioning from Zoom to Microsoft Teams, using the same tactic of tricking users into downloading a TeamsFx SDK this time to trigger the infection chain.

    Regardless of the lure used, the AppleScript is designed to install a phony application disguised as Zoom or Microsoft Teams. It also downloads another AppleScript dubbed DownTroy that checks stored passwords associated with password management applications and installs additional malware with root privileges.

    DownTroy, for its part, is engineered to drop several payloads as part of eight distinct attack chains, while also bypassing Apple’s Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) framework –

    • ZoomClutch or TeamsClutch, which uses a Swift-based implant that masquerades as Zoom or Teams while harboring functionality to prompt the user to enter their system password in order to complete the app update and exfiltrate the details to an external server
    • DownTroy v1, which uses a Go-based dropper to launch the AppleScript-based DownTroy malware that’s then responsible for downloading additional scripts from the server until the machine is rebooted.
    • CosmicDoor, which uses a C++ binary loader called GillyInjector (aka InjectWithDyld) to run a benign Mach-O app and inject a malicious payload into it at runtime. When it’s run with the –d flag, GillyInjector activates its destructive capabilities and irrevocably wipes all files in the current directory. The injected payload is a backdoor written in Nim named CosmicDoor that can communicate with an external server to receive and execute commands. It’s believed that the attackers first developed a Go version of CosmicDoor for Windows, before moving to Rust, Python, and Nim variants. It also downloads a bash script stealer suite named SilentSiphon.
    • RooTroy, which uses Nimcore loader to launch GillyInjector, which then injects a Go backdoor called RooTroy (aka Root Troy V4) to collect device information, enumerate running processes, read payload from a specific file, and download additional malware (counting RealTimeTroy) and execute them.
    • RealTimeTroy, which uses Nimcore loader to launch GillyInjector, which then injects a Go backdoor called RealTimeTroy that communicates with an external server using the WSS protocol to read/write files, get directory and process information, upload/download files, terminate a specified process, and get device information.
    • SneakMain, which uses Nimcore loader to launch a Nim payload called SneakMain to receive and execute additional AppleScript commands received from an external server.
    • DownTroy v2, which uses a dropper named CoreKitAgent to launch Nimcore loader, which then launches AppleScript-based DownTroy (aka NimDoor) to download an additional malicious script from an external server.
    • SysPhon, which uses a lightweight version of RustBucket named SysPhon and SUGARLOADER, a known loader previously to have delivered the KANDYKORN malware. SysPhon, also employed in the Hidden Risk campaign, is a downloader written in C++ that can conduct reconnaissance and fetch a binary payload from an external server.

    SilentSiphon is equipped to harvest data from Apple Notes, Telegram, web browser extensions, as well as credentials from browsers and password managers, and secrets stored in configuration files related to a long list of services: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, npm, Yarn, Python pip, RubyGems, Rust cargo, NET Nuget, AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud, Akamai Linode, DigitalOcean API, Vercel, Cloudflare, Netlify, Stripe, Firebase, Twilio, CircleCI, Pulumi, HashiCorp, SSH, FTP, Sui Blockchain, Solana, NEAR Blockchain, Aptos Blockchain, Algorand, Docker, Kubernetes, and OpenAI.

    “While the video feeds for fake calls were recorded via the fabricated Zoom phishing pages the actor created, the profile images of meeting participants appear to have been sourced from job platforms or social media platforms such as LinkedIn, Crunchbase, or X,” Kaspersky said. “Interestingly, some of these images were enhanced with [OpenAI] GPT-4o.”

    The GhostHire Campaign

    The GhostHire campaign, the Russian cybersecurity company added, also dates back to mid-2023, with the attackers initiating contact with the targets directly on Telegram, sharing details of a job offer along with a link to a LinkedIn profile impersonating recruiters at financial companies based in the U.S. in an attempt to lend the conversations a veneer of legitimacy.

    “Following up on initial communication, the actor adds the target to a user list for a Telegram bot, which displays the impersonated company’s logo and falsely claims to streamline technical assessments for candidates,” Kaspersky explained.

    CIS Build Kits

    “The bot then sends the victim an archive file (ZIP) containing a coding assessment project, along with a strict deadline (often around 30 minutes) to pressure the target into quickly completing the task. This urgency increases the likelihood of the target executing the malicious content, leading to initial system compromise.”

    The project in itself is innocuous, but incorporates a malicious dependency in the form of a malicious Go module hosted on GitHub (e.g., uniroute), causing the infection sequence to be triggered once the project is executed. This includes first determining the operating system of the victim’s computer and delivering an appropriate next-stage payload (i.e., DownTroy) programmed in PowerShell (Windows), bash script (Linux), or AppleScript (macOS).

    Also deployed via DownTroy in the attacks targeting Windows are RooTroy, RealTimeTroy, a Go version of CosmicDoor, and Rust-based loader named Bof that’s used to decode and launch an encrypted shellcode payload stored in the “C:Windowssystem32” folder.

    “Our research indicates a sustained effort by the actor to develop malware targeting both Windows and macOS systems, orchestrated through a unified command-and-control infrastructure,” Kaspersky said. “The use of generative AI has significantly accelerated this process, enabling more efficient malware development with reduced operational overhead.”

    “The actor’s targeting strategy has evolved beyond simple cryptocurrency and browser credential theft. Upon gaining access, they conduct comprehensive data acquisition across a range of assets, including infrastructure, collaboration tools, note-taking applications, development environments, and communication platforms (messengers).”


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • Why Early Threat Detection Is a Must for Long-Term Business Growth

    Why Early Threat Detection Is a Must for Long-Term Business Growth

    In cybersecurity, speed isn’t just a win — it’s a multiplier. The faster you learn about emerging threats, the faster you adapt your defenses, the less damage you suffer, and the more confidently your business keeps scaling. Early threat detection isn’t about preventing a breach someday: it’s about protecting the revenue you’re supposed to earn every day.

    Companies that treat cybersecurity as a reactive cost center usually find themselves patching holes, paying ransoms, and dealing with downtime. Companies that invest in proactive visibility, threat intelligence, and early detection mechanisms stay in the game longer. With trust, uptime, and innovation intact.

    Let’s break down why this strategy directly connects to long-term business success:

    1. Early detection drastically lowers the cost of incidents

    A breach caught at initial access might cost just internal response hours. Caught at data exfiltration — multiply the cost by 10, and a breach caught after regulatory violations kick in causes damage multiplied by 100+.

    Every malicious action not taken because you stopped the threat early equals:

    • No stolen customer data
    • No recovery downtime eating your revenue
    • No brand-damaging PR nightmare
    • No fines from regulators
    • No expensive rebuild of infrastructure.

    Early detection keeps risks tiny — before they evolve into crises.

    2. Faster response = confident operations = competitive power

    Business leaders care about ships sailing smoothly: new feature rollouts, customer onboarding, digital transformation — security must accelerate that, not block it.

    When SOC analysts receive enriched alerts and clear context instantly, decision-making shifts from:

    “Do we even know what this is?” to “Here’s the threat and here’s the action — done.”

    Security becomes a growth enabler, not a roadblock. Customers stick with companies that appear competent and trustworthy.

    3. A mature cyber posture unlocks serious business opportunities

    As you scale, new markets require compliance and certifications. Want to sell to an international bank? Host global data? Expand your cloud footprint? Proof of early detection capability becomes a contract requirement.

    Investors, partners, and enterprise clients love companies that can say: “We detect attacks early, and we can prove it.”

    Security maturity = business expansion power.

    How Threat Intelligence Helps Achieve Early Detection

    Threat intelligence is the strategic superpower that turns raw attack data into business protection and operational clarity. It shows who is attacking, how they operate, and where they strike next. Most leaders already know TI helps SOC teams fight known malware faster, but its real potential is earlier threat detection.

    With continuous visibility into active global campaigns and instant context around suspicious signals, TI empowers organizations to predict attacks instead of reacting to breaches. That shift (from hindsight to foresight) is what creates resilient, unstoppable business growth.

    Every attack campaign leaves breadcrumbs: infrastructure reuse, TTP patterns, shared payloads. Fresh cyber threat intelligence helps detect those signs before attackers succeed.

    Two solutions help businesses the most:

    Threat Intelligence Feeds

    A real-time stream of verified Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) mapped to active global malware campaigns. Your SIEM gets a steady flow of fresh indicators tied to active malware and a view into newly spun-up malicious infrastructure.

    The data comes from live malware detonations in ANY.RUN Sandbox enabling 500,000 malware analysts and 15 000 security teams to observe kill chains, malware configurations, and study TTPs in a safe interactive environment. It’s rich with telemetry from threat actors’ infrastructure and curated by ANY.RUN’s experts.

    Key features:

    • 99% unique, up-to-the-minute IPs, domains, URLs tied to real attacks;
    • STIX/TAXII format ready for integration with SIEM/SOAR systems;
    • Tags for malware family and risk level.
    ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Feeds: data, features, integration

    Your environment lights up the moment something suspicious appears, not a week later when the headlines drop. The business outcomes are:

    • Expanded threat coverage that includes emerging campaigns;
    • Faster and more accurate detections to prevent incidents before they strike;
    • Lower workload thanks to strict filtering of false positives draining SOC time;
    • Shorter MTTR thanks to context-enriched indicators, providing teams with the attack visibility they need.

    Shrink incident timelines. Expand your market runway.

    Contact ANY.RUN to get your trial of TI Feeds

    Threat Intelligence Lookup

    ANY.RUN’s TI Lookup provides instant context and reputation insights for any suspected indicator your SOC discovers. The information is derived from fresh incident investigations by over 15K corporate SOCs worldwide. Query artifacts and indicators leveraging more than 40 search parameters, view sandbox analyses exposing full attack chains, shrink MTTD to seconds.

    When your SOC already sees an alert, ANY.RUN’s TI Lookup tells them:

    • what malware family it belongs to
    • whether it’s part of a known campaign
    • how dangerous it is
    • what to do next.

    Instant context. Instant prioritization. Instant action. Together, they transform a SOC from overwhelmed to proactive.

    ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Lookup: turn raw indicators into actionable information

    Analysts resolve what matters — and stop chasing noise. Time saved implies lower operational costs, and finally, lower dwell time equals lower risk.

    Shrink incident timelines. Expand your market runway.

    Contact ANY.RUN to get 50 trial TI Lookup queries

    The bottom line

    Attackers are now faster than ever, using automation, AI, and endless ingenuity. The only way to outpace them is by detecting earlier and reacting smarter.

    And that’s exactly what Threat Intelligence Feeds + TI Lookup deliver:

    • Earlier visibility into active threats
    • Faster enrichment and triage of alerts
    • Stronger, more confident cyber posture
    • Reduced risk = sustained growth and customer trust.

    Early threat detection isn’t just a security outcome — it’s a business advantage. It paves your path to grow. It keeps your reputation intact. It ensures today’s success becomes tomorrow’s stability.

    If your organization is ready to stop fearing threats and start anticipating them, it’s time to give your SOC the intelligence edge it deserves.

    Know sooner. Act smarter. Grow safer with early alerts and instant context.

    Get your trial of TI Lookup & Feeds

    Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Google News, Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • Is Your Google Workspace as Secure as You Think it is?

    Is Your Google Workspace as Secure as You Think it is?

    The New Reality for Lean Security Teams

    If you’re the first security or IT hire at a fast-growing startup, you’ve likely inherited a mandate that’s both simple and maddeningly complex: secure the business without slowing it down.

    Most organizations using Google Workspace start with an environment built for collaboration, not resilience. Shared drives, permissive settings, and constant integrations make life easy for employees—and equally easy for attackers.

    The good news is that Google Workspace provides an excellent security foundation. The challenge lies in properly configuring it, maintaining visibility, and closing the blind spots that Google’s native controls leave open.

    This article breaks down the key practices every security team—especially small, lean ones—should follow to harden Google Workspace and defend against modern cloud threats.

    1. Lock Down the Basics

    Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

    MFA is the single most effective way to stop account compromise. In the Google Admin console, go to:

    Security → Authentication → 2-Step Verification

    • Set the policy to “On for everyone”.
    • Require security keys (FIDO2) or Google’s prompt-based MFA instead of SMS codes.
    • Enforce context-aware access for admins and executives—only allow logins from trusted networks or devices.

    Even with perfect phishing detection, stolen credentials are inevitable. MFA makes them useless.

    Harden Admin Access

    Admin accounts are a prime target. In Admin Console → Directory → Roles,

    • Limit the number of Super Admins to as few as possible.
    • Assign role-based access—e.g., Groups Admin, Help Desk Admin, or User Management Admin—instead of blanket privileges.
    • Turn on admin email alerts for privilege escalations or new role assignments.

    This ensures one compromised admin account doesn’t mean total compromise.

    Secure Sharing Defaults

    Google’s collaboration tools are powerful—but their default sharing settings can be dangerous.

    Under Apps → Google Workspace → Drive and Docs → Sharing Settings:

    • Set “Link Sharing” to Restricted (internal only by default).
    • Prevent users from making files public unless explicitly approved.
    • Disable “Anyone with the link” access for sensitive shared drives.

    Drive leaks rarely happen through malice—they happen through convenience. Tight defaults prevent accidental exposure.

    Control OAuth App Access

    Under Security → Access and Data Control → API Controls,

    • Review all third-party apps connected to Workspace under App access control.
    • Block any app that requests “Full access to Gmail”, “Drive read/write”, or “Directory access” without a clear business case.
    • Whitelist only trusted, vetted vendors.

    Compromised or poorly coded apps can become silent backdoors to your data.

    2. Fortify Against Email Threats

    Email remains the most targeted and exploited part of any organization’s cloud environment.

    While Google’s built-in phishing protection blocks a lot, it can’t always stop socially engineered or internally originated attacks—especially those leveraging compromised accounts.

    To improve resilience:

    • Turn on advanced phishing and malware protection:
      • In Admin Console → Apps → Google Workspace → Gmail → Safety, enable settings for “Protect against inbound phishing, malware, spam, and domain impersonation” and “Detect unusual attachment types”.
      • Enable “Protect against anomalous attachment behavior” for Drive links embedded in emails.
    • Enable DMARC, DKIM, and SPF:

      These three email authentication mechanisms ensure attackers can’t impersonate your domain. Set them up under Apps → Google Workspace → Settings for Gmail → Authenticate Email.

    • Train your users—but back it up with automation:

      Phishing awareness helps, but human error is inevitable. Layer detection and response tools that can identify suspicious internal messages, lateral phishing attempts, or malicious attachments that bypass Google’s filters.

    Email threats today move fast. Response speed—not just detection—is critical.

    3. Detect and Contain Account Takeovers

    A compromised Google account can cascade quickly. Attackers can access shared Drives, steal OAuth tokens, and silently exfiltrate data.

    Proactive Monitoring

    In the Security Dashboard → Investigation Tool, monitor for:

    • Sudden login attempts from new geolocations.
    • Unusual download volumes from Drive.
    • Automatic forwarding rules that send mail externally.

    Automated Alerts

    Set up automated alerts for:

    • Password resets without MFA challenge.
    • Suspicious OAuth grants.
    • Failed login bursts or credential stuffing activity.

    Google’s alerts are helpful but limited. They don’t correlate across multiple accounts or detect subtle, slow-moving compromises.

    4. Understand and Protect Your Data

    It’s impossible to secure what you don’t understand. Most organizations have years of unclassified, sensitive data buried in Drive and Gmail—financial models, customer data, source code, HR files.

    Data Discovery and DLP

    While Google offers Data Loss Prevention (DLP), it’s rigid and often noisy.

    Under Security → Data Protection, you can:

    • Create rules for detecting patterns like credit card numbers, SSNs, or custom keywords.
    • Apply them to Drive, Gmail, and Chat.
    • But beware of false positives and the administrative overhead of manual triage.

    Smarter Access and Governance

    • Enable Drive labels to classify sensitive content.
    • Use context-aware access to require MFA or device trust for sensitive data.
    • Monitor public link sharing with regular Drive audits.

    When sensitive files are inevitably over-shared, automation—not manual cleanup—should handle it.

    5. Balance Collaboration and Control

    Google Workspace thrives because of its openness—but that openness can create silent exposure.

    To protect data without throttling productivity:

    • Enable Drive sharing alerts to notify users when sensitive data is shared externally.
    • Implement “justification workflows” where users must explain why they’re sharing outside the domain.
    • Periodically revoke inactive user access and external file links.

    Security shouldn’t mean saying “no.” It should mean enabling safe collaboration by default.

    From Foundation to Fortress: Filling the Native Gaps

    Even with every native control tuned, Google Workspace still has blind spots—because its tools were designed for collaboration first, and security second.

    The Gaps:

    • Limited Context: Google sees events in isolation—one login anomaly or one shared file—but not the relationships between them.
    • Reactive Response: Detection exists, but automated remediation is minimal. You’ll still rely heavily on manual triage.
    • Data at Rest Blindness: Sensitive data buried in Gmail and Drive is unprotected once it’s stored, even though it’s often the highest-value target.

    This is where Material Security transforms Workspace from a secure platform into a truly resilient one.

    How Material Extends Google Workspace Security

    1. Email Security Beyond the Inbox

      Material detects and neutralizes sophisticated phishing, internal impersonation, and BEC-style attacks that slip past Google’s filters.

      • It uses relationship modeling to understand who your employees regularly communicate with and flags anomalies instantly.
      • Automated playbooks handle remediation at machine speed—quarantining, removing, or flagging threats across inboxes in seconds.
    2. Account Takeover Detection and Response

      Material monitors a rich set of behavioral signals—forwarding rule changes, credential resets, unusual data access—to detect compromised accounts early.

      • Automated workflows isolate affected accounts, revoke tokens, and stop data exfiltration in real time.
      • This transforms detection from hours to seconds, eliminating the long dwell times that make takeovers so damaging.
    3. Data Discovery and Protection at Scale

      Material continuously scans Gmail and Drive to identify sensitive data—PII, contracts, source code—and applies customizable, risk-based access controls.

      • For example, a user trying to open a payroll file might be prompted to re-authenticate with MFA.
      • Drive sharing violations can trigger automatic permission revocations or user notifications, ensuring self-healing security that doesn’t slow teams down.
    4. Unified Visibility Across the Cloud Office

      Instead of managing dozens of disjointed alerts, Material correlates identity, data, and email signals into a unified dashboard—providing context, prioritization, and automated enforcement.

    Final Thoughts

    Google Workspace offers a secure foundation, but it’s only that—a foundation.

    As your company grows, your threat surface expands, and the native tools’ limits start to show.

    Building on Google’s strong base with solutions like Material Security gives teams the leverage to:

    • Automate what used to take hours of manual effort.
    • See and stop sophisticated threats across email, data, and accounts.
    • Protect the information that defines your business—without adding friction.

    Interested in seeing how Material secures your entire Google Workspace?

    Request a demo of Material Security

    Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Google News, Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • Chrome Zero-Day Exploited to Deliver Italian Memento Labs' LeetAgent Spyware

    Chrome Zero-Day Exploited to Deliver Italian Memento Labs' LeetAgent Spyware

    The zero-day exploitation of a now-patched security flaw in Google Chrome led to the distribution of an espionage-related tool from Italian information technology and services provider Memento Labs, according to new findings from Kaspersky.

    The vulnerability in question is CVE-2025-2783 (CVSS score: 8.3), a case of sandbox escape which the company disclosed in March 2025 as having come under active exploitation as part of a campaign dubbed Operation ForumTroll targeting organizations in Russia. The cluster is also tracked as TaxOff/Team 46 by Positive Technologies and Prosperous Werewolf by BI.ZONE. It’s known to be active since at least February 2024.

    The wave of infections involved sending phishing emails containing personalized, short-lived links inviting recipients to the Primakov Readings forum. Clicking the links through Google Chrome or a Chromium-based web browser was enough to trigger an exploit for CVE-2025-2783, enabling the attackers to break out of the confines of the program and deliver tools developed by Memento Labs.

    Headquartered in Milan, Memento Labs (also stylized as mem3nt0) was formed in April 2019 following the merger of InTheCyber Group and HackingTeam (aka Hacking Team), the latter of which has a history of selling offensive intrusion and surveillance capabilities to governments, law enforcement agencies, and corporations, including creating spyware designed to monitor the Tor browser.

    DFIR Retainer Services

    Most notably, the infamous surveillance software vendor suffered a hack in July 2015, resulting in the leak of hundreds of gigabytes of internal data, including tools and exploits. Among these was an Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) development kit dubbed VectorEDK that would later go on to become the foundation for a UEFI bootkit known as MosaicRegressor. In April 2016, the company courted a further setback after Italian export authorities revoked its license to sell outside of Europe.

    In the latest set of attacks documented by the Russian cybersecurity vendor, the lures targeted media outlets, universities, research centers, government organizations, financial institutions, and other organizations in Russia with the primary goal of espionage.

    “This was a targeted spear-phishing operation, not a broad, indiscriminate campaign,” Boris Larin, principal security researcher at Kaspersky Global Research and Analysis Team (GReAT), told The Hacker News. “We observed multiple intrusions against organizations and individuals in Russia and Belarus, with lures aimed at media outlets, universities, research centers, government bodies, financial institutions, and others in Russia.”

    Most notably, the attacks have been found to pave the way for a previously undocumented spyware developed by Memento Labs called LeetAgent, owing to the use of leetspeak for its commands.

    The starting point is a validator phase, which is a small script executed by the browser to check if the visitor to the malicious site is a genuine user with a real web browser, and then leverages CVE-2025-2783 to detonate the sandbox escape in order to achieve remote code execution and drop a loader responsible for launching LeetAgent.

    The malware is capable of connecting to a command-and-control (C2) server over HTTPS and receiving instructions that allow it to perform a wide range of tasks –

    • 0xC033A4D (COMMAND) – Run command using cmd.exe
    • 0xECEC (EXEC) – Execute a process
    • 0x6E17A585 (GETTASKS) – Get a list of tasks that the agent is currently executing
    • 0x6177 (KILL) – Stop a task
    • 0xF17E09 (FILE x09) – Write to file
    • 0xF17ED0 (FILE xD0) – Read a file
    • 0x1213C7 (INJECT) – Inject shellcode
    • 0xC04F (CONF) – Set communication parameters
    • 0xD1E (DIE) – Quit
    • 0xCD (CD) – Change current working directory
    • 0x108 (JOB) – Set parameters for keylogger or file stealer to harvest files matching extensions *.doc, *.xls, *.ppt, *.rtf, *.pdf, *.docx, *.xlsx, and *.pptx

    The malware used in the intrusions has been traced all the way back to 2022, with the threat actor also linked to a broader set of malicious cyber activity aimed at organizations and individuals in Russia and Belarus using phishing emails carrying malicious attachments as a distribution vector.

    “Proficiency in Russian and familiarity with local peculiarities are distinctive features of the ForumTroll APT group, traits that we have also observed in its other campaigns,” Larin said. “However, mistakes in some of those other cases suggest that the attackers were not native Russian speakers.”

    CIS Build Kits

    It’s worth noting that at this stage, Positive Technologies, in a report published in June 2025, also disclosed an identical cluster of activity that involved the exploitation of CVE-2025-2783 by a threat actor it tracks as TaxOff to deploy a backdoor called Trinper. Larin told The Hacker News that the two sets of attacks are connected.

    “In several incidents, the LeetAgent backdoor used in Operation ForumTroll directly launched the more sophisticated Dante spyware,” Larin explained.

    “Beyond that handoff, we observed overlaps in tradecraft: identical COM-hijacking persistence, similar file-system paths, and data hidden in font files. We also found shared code between the exploit/loader and Dante. Taken together, these points indicate the same actor/toolset behind both clusters.”

    Dante, which emerged in 2022 as a replacement for another spyware referred to as Remote Control Systems (RCS), comes with an array of protections to resist analysis. It obfuscates control flow, hides imported functions, adds anti-debugging checks, and nearly every string in the source code is encrypted. It also queries the Windows Event Log for events that may indicate the use of malware analysis tools or virtual machines to fly under the radar.

    Once all the checks are passed, the spyware proceeds to launch an orchestrator module that’s engineered to communicate with a C2 server via HTTPS, load other components either from the file system or memory, and remote itself if it doesn’t receive commands within a set number of days specified in the configuration, and erase traces of all activity.

    There is currently no information about the nature of additional modules launched by the spyware. While the threat actor behind Operation ForumTroll has not been observed using Dante in the campaign exploiting the Chrome security flaw, Larin said that there is evidence to suggest wider usage of Dante in other attacks. But he pointed out it’s too early to reach any definitive conclusion about scope or attribution.


    Source: thehackernews.com…

  • SideWinder Adopts New ClickOnce-Based Attack Chain Targeting South Asian Diplomats

    SideWinder Adopts New ClickOnce-Based Attack Chain Targeting South Asian Diplomats

    Oct 28, 2025Ravie LakshmananCyber Espionage / Malware

    ClickOnce-Based Attack Chain

    A European embassy located in the Indian capital of New Delhi, as well as multiple organizations in Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, have emerged as the target of a new campaign orchestrated by a threat actor known as SideWinder in September 2025.

    The activity “reveals a notable evolution in SideWinder’s TTPs, particularly the adoption of a novel PDF and ClickOnce-based infection chain, in addition to their previously documented Microsoft Word exploit vectors,” Trellix researchers Ernesto Fernández Provecho and Pham Duy Phuc said in a report published last week.

    The attacks, which involved sending spear-phishing emails in four waves from March through September 2025, are designed to drop malware families such as ModuleInstaller and StealerBot to gather sensitive information from compromised hosts.

    While ModuleInstaller serves as a downloader for next-stage payloads, including StealerBot, the latter is a .NET implant that can launch a reverse shell, deliver additional malware, and collect a wide range of data from compromised hosts, including screenshots, keystrokes, passwords, and files.

    DFIR Retainer Services

    It should be noted that both ModuleInstaller and StealerBot were first publicly documented by Kaspersky in October 2024 as part of attacks mounted by the hacking group targeting high-profile entities and strategic infrastructures in the Middle East and Africa.

    As recently as May 2025, Acronis revealed SideWinder’s attacks aimed at government institutions in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Pakistan using malware-laden documents susceptible to known Microsoft Office flaws to launch a multi-stage attack chain and ultimately deliver StealerBot.

    The latest set of attacks, observed by Trellix post September 1, 2025, and targeting Indian embassies, entails the use of Microsoft Word and PDF documents in phishing emails with titles such as “Inter-ministerial meeting Credentials.pdf” or “India-Pakistan Conflict -Strategic and Tactical Analysis of the May 2025.docx.” The messages are sent from the domain “mod.gov.bd.pk-mail[.]org” in an attempt to mimic the Ministry of Defense of Pakistan.

    “The initial infection vector is always the same: a PDF file that cannot be properly seen by the victim or a Word document that contains some exploit,” Trellix said. “The PDF files contain a button that urges the victim to download and install the latest version of Adobe Reader to view the document’s content.”

    Doing so, however, triggers the download of a ClickOnce application from a remote server (“mofa-gov-bd.filenest[.]live”), which, when launched, sideloads a malicious DLL (“DEVOBJ.dll”), while simultaneously launching a decoy PDF document to the victims.

    The ClickOnce application is a legitimate executable from MagTek Inc. (“ReaderConfiguration.exe”) that masquerades as Adobe Reader and is signed with a valid signature to avoid raising any red flags. Furthermore, requests to the command-and-control (C2) server are region-locked to South Asia and the path to download the payload is dynamically generated, complicating analysis efforts.

    CIS Build Kits

    The rogue DLL, for its part, is designed to decrypt and launch a .NET loader named ModuleInstaller, which then proceeds to profile the infected system and deliver the StealerBot malware.

    The findings indicate an ongoing effort on the part of the persistent threat actors to refine their modus operandi and circumvent security defenses to accomplish their goals.

    “The multi-wave phishing campaigns demonstrate the group’s adaptability in crafting highly specific lures for various diplomatic targets, indicating a sophisticated understanding of geopolitical contexts,” Trellix said. “The consistent use of custom malware, such as ModuleInstaller and StealerBot, coupled with the clever exploitation of legitimate applications for side-loading, underscores SideWinder’s commitment to sophisticated evasion techniques and espionage objectives.”


    Source: thehackernews.com…